Myths & Misconceptions About Relocation in Washington
Myth: “A parent cannot move if the other parent objects.”
Objection does not automatically stop a move. Washington law creates a presumption that a parent with the majority of residential time will be allowed to relocate with the child. The burden rests on the objecting parent to show that the move would cause specific harm to the child that goes beyond the normal challenges of long-distance parenting. Courts look for concrete, child-centered evidence, and the objecting parent must meet this higher standard to successfully block the relocation.
Myth: “If the move is within the same school district, I don’t have to give notice.”
Notice is still required. The format is different, but parents with majority or substantially equal time must inform the other parent of any move. Missing notice deadlines can lead to contempt, travel restrictions, or court sanctions. An attorney can help you avoid accidental violations.
Myth: “If the other parent files an objection, I definitely cannot move.”
An objection does not block the move by itself. It simply starts the court’s review process. Washington law still presumes the relocating parent may move with the child if they have the majority of residential time. The objecting parent must prove that the relocation would create specific harm to the child that goes beyond the ordinary challenges of long-distance parenting. A well prepared relocation proposal can still succeed even when the other parent objects, and experienced legal help can make a meaningful difference in how the court views the case.
Myth: “I can move first and deal with the parenting plan later.”
Moving without proper notice is a violation of the parenting plan. Judges can order the child returned, impose penalties, or limit the relocating parent’s time. Before making plans, speak with an attorney so you do not unintentionally harm your case.
Myth: “Travel costs always fall on the parent who moves.”
Courts can divide costs, shift them based on income, or adjust child support. There is no automatic rule. Judges focus on what is fair for the child and practical for both parents. A lawyer can help frame your request so the court sees the full picture.
Myth: “Relocation cases are just like modifying a parenting plan.”
Relocation follows its own statute, its own procedure, and its own timeline. The analysis is different from a typical modification case. Mistaking one process for the other can destroy an otherwise strong relocation argument.
Myth: “If my ex moves out of state without notice, nothing can be done.”
Unauthorized relocation is serious. Courts can order immediate return of the child, suspend the relocating parent’s time, or hold them in contempt. These cases move fast and require quick legal action to protect your rights.
Myth: “The court will favor the parent who wants to move because change is inevitable.”
Not true. Although Washington law presumes that a parent with the majority of residential time may relocate, the objecting parent can still win. Success depends on showing, with specific evidence, how the move would harm the child in ways that go beyond the ordinary challenges of distance. Courts look closely at involvement, school stability, support networks, and each parent’s ability to meet the child’s needs. When the objection is well prepared and supported by strong documentation, judges do block relocations. A carefully crafted objection from an experienced attorney can shift the outcome in close cases.
Myth: “Judges prefer to keep children with the mother in relocation cases.”
Washington law is gender-neutral. What matters is past caregiving, parental involvement, stability, and the relocation factors. Many fathers succeed in relocation cases when they have a strong factual foundation and proper legal guidance.
Myth: “I do not need a lawyer because relocation is simple if I follow the notice rules.”
Relocation is one of the most technical areas of Washington family law. Notice is only the first step. Strategy, timing, declarations, and statutory arguments all matter. Parents who try to handle relocation alone often lose the case before it fully begins.